Three flavors of fun and one bummer

Most people move from left to right throughout life, away from feel-good idealism toward coherent thought. But if one wants to be a liberal, one must use pure emotion to resist this process, known as “maturing.”

Odd though it is, liberals lay claim to broad-mindedness. But blindly accepting this contention is a mistake, for nothing could be further from the truth about liberals, who come in four basic types.

First, we have the straight-up feel-good “progressive,” whose mission in life to to cling to warm fuzzies. This type of liberal filters out realities which the less evolved see as reason not to ride the imaginary love train. Former Presidential hopeful Dennis Kucinich would “enable the goddess of peace to encircle within her arms all the children of this country and… of the world,” and “make war a thing of the past…” For more substance, we turn to Barack Obama, who will use the power of his Christian messianic personality to convince Iran’s sworn haters of Christians and Jews to renounce a 1400-year-old desire to kill Jews and obliterate all religions but their own.

Second, there are angry progressives. Energetic, manic, and only tenuously attuned to the real world, these critters formulate ultra-liberal concepts and Marxist tactics. With an anything-but-warm fuzzy logic as guidance, their humanity sulks beneath a mist of vaporized venom. Are you rage-driven? This one’s for you. The non-religious are Angry Secular Progressives. Because Pharaohs used asps to represent power over life and death, the three-letter acronym for Angry Secular Progressives is a point of pride. Yet some people refer to ASPs as Secular Angry Progressives, yielding another and rather unfortunate acronym.

Lovingly motivated and yet stunningly disturbed, the third and most frenetic liberal is the hybrid. In this case, motivation randomly wobbles between anger and kindness. Understandably, people generally fear the unpredictable hybrids. To be one, you must parade a glassy-eyed contempt for reality, personally savaging anyone who offers facts which threaten your flimsy feel-good. Hybrids wield the vainest illogic imaginable in order to draw attention to themselves. Witness Hillary Clinton’s 2007 universal health care proposal which would have made it illegal to be employed without insurance. Illegal aliens should work unfettered, but legal citizens become criminals if they work without health coverage.

Inspirational.

Fourth, we have logical, sensible, and nearly extinct classical liberals, who want human progress through compassionate action. But they commit the ultimate progressive sin by engaging in careful thought, analyzing their impulses, and avoiding emotionality in their judgment. Because this more aptly describes today’s conservatives, modern liberals don’t waste their time with such behaviors.

Historically, the term “left” denoted people associated with variants of socialism, anarchism, communism, or social democracy. “Liberal” indicated progressive thinkers in social, economic, and political arenas, stopping short of leftism. But since the 1960s, these distinctions have eroded. The erosion has been so staggering since the Supreme Court settled the 2000 Presidential Election that scores of liberals now manifest fundamentally leftist attributes.

Pushing socialism dominates the behavior of many liberal politicians—especially this year as politicos charm their victim groups for the votes needed to keep doing what they’re doing. Which is, of course, charming their victim groups so that they can keep doing what they’re doing.

The modern-day sociopolitical term, “progressive,” describes that which comforts people while defying rationality. “Progressives” are the elite, bristling with ideas on how to run government and society. Affirmations reinforce a sense of superiority and show off their holiness. “Give peace a chance. War is not the answer. You can roller skate in a buffalo herd.”

What makes these so-called “progressives,” the current label preferred by liberals, think and behave the way that they do?

Liberals live in theory, ignoring endless disasters and pretending that the world actually operates as they imagine. Unable to stomach human nature’s dark side, ideology shields liberals’ senses and plays to their insatiable need to feel good—about themselves. Wishful-thinking ideology spawns a belief that behavior can be legislated, hatching countless “helping” programs which only intensify human failings.

Liberals despise unbelievers who stress that handouts enable dependence. Might such blasphemers also deem it unwise to poke at your eyes and ears with a Barack Obama campaign pin? Dare we answer?

Unpracticed in the code of the enlightened ones, novice liberals suffer personality flaws or “hang-ups” common to conservatives and libertarians. They:

  1. Let facts influence them.
  2. Place importance on results.
  3. Think.
  4. Hold people accountable for choices and actions.
  5. Judge behaviors as right, wrong, good, or bad.
  6. Attribute humane qualities, particularly decency, to conservatives.
  7. Ascribe noble intentions and behaviors to America.

People who triumph over these imperfections become highly effective liberals. They attain elevated consciousness and promise to save humanity. These guardians of salvation wield their own seven hang-ups, polar opposites of the conservative-libertarian hang-ups, as anesthesia against liberalism’s failure-infested track record.

When liberal dogmatists encounter agenda-busting facts, they grin the knowing grin, stare the enlightened stare, and chant blissful fallacies over and over again. Like so, liberals cling to their feel-good by equating idealism to practicality, nonsense to wisdom, blindness to vision, and growling at anyone exposing the futility in their “solutions.”

These creatures hoarsely whine about reality in roles like actor, government subsidized artist, critic, social worker, unemployed Air America host, psychologist, and Democrat politician.

Conservatives produce results and output. Liberals’ birthright is to govern results and distribute output. Liberals seek freebies and preferential treatment for “victims” whose numbers swell as liberal schemes multiply. Deploying such schemes, with election results ensured, herds of donkeys leap forth to carry the inevitable casualties to gathering places where “help” is dispensed.

Reading about liberals’ seven hang-ups, which are indeed their guiding principles, cannot anoint one as an expert. But there is plenty of practical opportunity to study real-life liberals. About 20 percent of Americans call themselves “liberal.” They are full of… willingness to embrace chaotic emotion in lieu of evidence. People who join the liberal choir swear that they are in an echo chamber as their complaints waft back to them in soul-drenching validation.

Practitioners of liberalism build confidence through idyllic ignorance of all things logical, see themselves as smart in life’s classroom of dunces, adopt rabid devotion to liberalism, and count themselves as kindhearted and moral amongst depraved ogres. All liberals eventually discover…

There is no need for thought. Liberal is as liberal does.

Pages from the liberal playbook

Reality can only distract. The liberal’s job is to do whatever it takes to feel good inside. (Playbook, page 1.)

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton blast Republican inertia during the current economic downturn and call for strong government control of Wall Street. Clinton criticizes John McCain for not wanting to intervene. This is instructive. The Playbook demands that liberals attack people who point up government’s knack for bumbling most of what government touches.

Hillary says that government is responsible for the unemployed and should help people “gain new skills.” The the liberal view, Washington must comfort citizens who are victimized by everyone else in their harsh, unjust worlds. Clinton wants to take responsible people’s money and give it to people who don’t bother to “transition” out of disappearing jobs. Feel-good liberals with an eye on votes thrive on the Utopian vibe that flows from government caring for folks.

Realizing that liberals are duty-bound to watch over the unsophisticated masses, Obama wants to save people from their own “dangerous risks.” The Senator hankers to bail out over-mortgaged homeowners and the long-term jobless. Socialist Economics 101 and Playbook page 256: Enable the habits of the reckless and chronically idle. One group gets to keep homes that they knew all along they couldn’t afford. The other loafs—endlessly. Both groups remain loyal Democrats.

Senator McCain indicates that liberals “seek big government programs that sock it to American taxpayers while failing to solve the very real problems we face.” True, but the behavior that McCain highlights pales before Obama’s heady insistence that government regulate institutions that borrow from government and also step up regulation of mortgage-backed securities, but nevertheless “streamline” overall regulation. Straight from page 171: Easy is hard, right is wrong, they are the eggmen, and I am the walrus—goo goo goo joob.

Senators Obama and Clinton offer little cogent detail to back up their pronouncements. Today’s last lesson, page 219: Never give specifics; insist that life is great under socialism, I mean liberalism, despite the sum total of human experience offering irrefutable proof to the contrary.